Introduction to Cueing: The Frans Bosch Method by Hanna Cabrera

[This is a guest post by Hanna Cabrera. Hanna is a recent Exercise Science graduate from UNC Charlotte. She is passionate about strength and conditioning and enhancing sports performance through evidence-based coaching. She is currently taking part in the Athletic Lab Coaching Mentorship Program.] Frans Bosch is a Dutch sports scientist, author, and renowned coach recognized for his innovative approach to athletic performance, particularly in the areas of biomechanics, motor learning, and strength training. He has lectured in motor learning and biomechanics at Fontys University of Applied Sciences in the Netherlands and has coached elite athletes across multiple sports, including track and field, rugby, soccer, and baseball [1]. Throughout his career, Bosch has challenged traditional strength and conditioning practices that focus on isolated muscle training and strict technical instruction. He promotes a systems-based approach that emphasizes coordination, variability, and adaptability [1,2]. He believes these qualities are essential for developing athletes who can perform effectively in unpredictable, real-world environments. His work has inspired coaches to rethink how they teach movement, highlighting that athletic success depends not only on physical strength but also on the ability to coordinate and adapt efficiently under pressure [1]. Building Athlete Independence Bosch’s coaching philosophy emphasizes the importance of aligning feedback with the athlete’s developmental stage and the specific demands of the sport [1,2]. He believes that athletes develop a stronger sense of self-efficacy when they are given the freedom to explore movement challenges independently rather than relying too heavily on instruction. This approach encourages athletes to take ownership of their learning process and ultimately build confidence in their ability to problem-solve during performance. By creating space for exploration, athletes learn to self-organize and discover efficient movement solutions on their own. Understanding [...]

By |2025-10-21T16:02:41-04:00October 20th, 2025|Training Info|0 Comments

The Importance of Neurocognitive Tasks in Day to Day Sport Practice by Kat Perille

[This is a guest blog by Katherine Perille. Kat holds an MS in Kinesiology with a concentration in biomechanics. She is completing a Sports Science Mentorship at Athletic Lab.] Current training programs and sport practices focus solely on skill development and neuromuscular training; however, there is something to be said about adding neurocognitive tasks to day-to-day sport practice. According to Dr. Michele LaBotz, the goal of neuromuscular training is to improve muscular strength and connections, increase awareness of an individual’s technique and the ways in which their bodies move [1]. Neuromuscular training is also all about improving performance while lowering injury risk. All ages and all levels can benefit from neuromuscular training where agility, balance, and speed are emphasized [1]; however, there is another element that can be added that can be beneficial for athlete’s performance and injury reduction rates: neurocognitive training. During game-like conditions, an athlete does not have the time or mental capacity to focus strictly on performing a run-to-cut maneuver. Their attention is on what is going on around them and less on what is happening to them. There is little to no ability to ensure proper running and cutting movement. If you were to think about a soccer game… you have the ball and there is an oncoming defender. You need to make the decision of whether you are going to cut around the defender or pass the ball. During this time, you may be getting verbal cues from your teammates telling you where to go and/or where to pass the ball. You are thinking about everything around you except the proper way to perform a safe and efficient run-to-cut maneuver. The integration of neuromuscular and neurocognitive training can better prepare [...]

By |2025-02-19T14:47:38-05:00June 26th, 2024|Training Info|0 Comments

Motor Learning – Part 3: Unconscious Learning by Alex Penner

[Alex Penner is the Director of Coaching & Community at Athletic Lab] A recurring theme in the previous two motor learning (part 1, part 2) blogs is the necessity of struggle during the learning process. True learning doesn't come easy, so it follows that effort is a requirement. However, when asking any current or former athlete to recall some of their greatest moments in sports, they'll often describe a feeling of "effortlessness." Ask them to recall one of their worst performances and they may describe it as "forced." It's counterintuitive that performance decrements could result from trying harder, but it appears that this notion is supported both by anecdotes and what is known about motor control. This article will aim to explain the role of unconscious processing in motor learning and performance. Basics of Motor Control First, it's necessary to have a basic understanding of how the nervous system is involved in movement. The nervous system can be thought of as the software that controls muscle action. Sensory neurons pick up information about our body and the environment, while motor neurons deliver messages to the muscles to either contract or relax. The brain is the command center where movement signals originate, with the exception of reflex arcs which go directly from the sensory neurons to the spinal cord before triggering an involuntary muscle action (Powers & Howley, 2014, pp. 146-148). Within the brain, there is just as much unconscious processing ongoing as there is conscious processing. While reading this article, you probably haven't been concentrating on breathing, but you've been doing it anyway and can control it if you choose. Alternatively, as conscious as you may be of your heart rate during times of high [...]

By |2020-05-07T11:39:33-04:00May 7th, 2020|News|0 Comments

Motor Learning – Part 2: The Impact of Feedback by Alex Penner

[Alex Penner is the Director of Coaching & Community at Athletic Lab] As discussed in the overview of motor learning concepts, athletes derive feedback both from within themselves (intrinsic feedback) and from their environment (extrinsic or augmented feedback) which includes interaction with coaches. In this article, we'll focus primarily on how the coach can provide feedback to enhance motor learning. Most coaches are well-meaning when giving feedback to their athletes. They see their athlete struggling with a move or a concept and the tendency is to give them the solution. The athlete will generally see significant improvement within the session thanks to the coach's help. Similarly, when your GPS gives you turn-by-turn directions, you can be very confident that you'll end up at your intended destination. However, how comfortable would you feel navigating your return trip if your GPS unexpectedly broke? Without having to figure out the route to your destination in the first place, it's unlikely you paid enough attention to what was relevant. In the case of our athletes, that's the same situation in which they find themselves on the next occasion that they have to perform. For this reason, it's crucial that we don't spoon-feed our athletes in practice as it deprives them of the opportunity to learn. Before exploring how to give feedback, let's get clear on the goals of motor learning and how feedback fits in. Over time, we want to develop competence, consistency, psychological efficiency, and independence (Freeman, 2014, p. 17). The end goal is the stage of automaticity, in which the athlete is able to perform movement skills correctly & consistently with minimal mental-effort, while having the ability to self-correct mistakes (Statler & Dubois, 2015, p. 156). As [...]

By |2020-05-07T11:27:20-04:00April 30th, 2020|Training Info|0 Comments

Motor Learning – Part 1: An Overview of Fundamental Concepts by Alex Penner

[Alex Penner is the Director of Coaching & Community at Athletic Lab] For coaches, P.E. teachers, and sports-medicine professionals alike, it's crucial to understand the factors that influence the process of motor learning in the populations that you serve. In this article, my intention is to provide you with a basic understanding of the fundamental concepts that influence motor learning, and in subsequent articles we'll explore these concepts and their applications in further depth. Although I'll be referring to training athletes throughout this article, these concepts will be relevant to any population where movement and learning are concerned. Motor learning is the process of acquiring and retaining movement skills. For clarity, we'll define skill as the coordinated movement of the limbs or body in order to accomplish a task or goal. There are two main criteria for evaluating motor learning and the effectiveness of practice design. Retention is the measurement of whether the practice made the skill "stick." Improvements within a training session are not indicative of retention as it can only be assessed after a break from practice. Transfer is the degree to which the task performed in practice leads to improvements in performance of a different task. For athletes, the retention test and the transfer test are the same thing. It's the competition. Since practice and competition take place on separate occasions, and practice also differs in structure from the competition, coaches must take into account the impact on retention and transfer when designing practices and interacting with athletes. What Does Learning Look Like Many people are familiar with the quote from Vince Lombardi 'Practice does not make perfect. Only perfect practice makes perfect.' It highlights a commonly-held belief that the better the [...]

By |2020-05-07T11:27:46-04:00April 22nd, 2020|Training Info|0 Comments

Using Attentional Cues as a Coach: The Benefits of Internal and External Visualization by Tyler Preston

[Tyler Preston is a Masters Student at NCSU and an Athletic Development Intern at Athletic Lab] Our minds have a huge capacity in determining our muscles success during an exercise. While we all know that muscle movement is initiated by the brain, did you also know you can influence this output by focusing your attention on certain aspects of the movement. Have you noticed when you are trained by a coach they will try to have you focus on certain characteristics of the exercise? Typically, these attentional cues fall into two categories: Internal cues and external cues. Internal cues place the athlete's attention on their body movements1. For example, during a squat a coach may say, squeeze your glutes as your reach the peak of your squat. With this, we see that internal cues focus the athlete's attention on the muscle utilized in the movement. External cues, on the other hand, direct the athlete's attention to the movement's effect on the environment. Something as simple as "drive the bar up" could be used as an external cue for our squatting scenario. Therefore, external cues tend to point out the goal the exercise wants to accomplish2. Surprisingly, studies have shown that these cues have different effects on the muscle and its ability to complete the movement. In addition, studies have shown a difference in the type of cues elite athletes use compared to amateurs. My goal in this post is to examine the research, and then discuss how using different types of cues can change the focus of an exercise. In terms of resistance training, studies point to external focus producing a more efficient neuromuscular system3. Marchant et al. studied the effects external and internal cues [...]

By |2017-04-13T10:57:47-04:00February 6th, 2015|Training Info|0 Comments
Go to Top